THE GOOD
USE OF PESTICIDES
A world without synthetic pesticides is not currently possible, whatever
some say, especially because
- World population has grown
exponentially in recent decades,
- Food needs have skyrocketed
- Many phytosanitary problems
which could seriously affect agricultural production currently don't have other
effective solution
- Available agricultural land
for food production are reduced (urbanization, desertification, biofuels
production, production of biological pesticides, etc.)
Pesticides available to organic farming are progressively more numerous
and cover increasingly diverse needs. However, they are not yet sufficiently
numerous and versatile to meet all needs.
Yet, as I explained to you in my last article (http://culturagriculture.blogspot.com.es/2016/01/66-plant-protection-4-on-boarders-of.html) , it would be enough to
revise the requirements of organic agriculture, accepting "pesticides-copies",
which are none other than synthetic making of natural molecules, to cover most
of the shortcomings of biological pharmacopoeia.
But here we enter a highly political area, where logic, long-term vision,
the real consideration of environmental issues and simple consistency, pass in
the background in front of the search of power and manipulation of opinion in
an ideological objective.
All this to say that, in the present state of agriculture, it is
entirely possible to make a conventional farming, very respectful of
environment and health.
But it is also to say that the risks associated with pesticide use are
the same for natural products as synthetic products.
Some precautions are of course necessary to minimize the impact of
pesticides.
Again, these recommendations are valid for both synthetic pesticides and
biological pesticides. If an active ingredient kills pests, it is likely that
it also kills beneficial insects or has undesirable side effects, either if it
is derived from synthetic chemistry or if it is a plant extract.
For the use of all types of pesticides, certain precautions are necessary
to ensure that the impact is minimal.
So, what are correct conditions,
when talking about pesticides?
It covers several key points:
A
trained staff: all people involved have to be
properly trained, both for mandatory training for handling products, for the
observation of crops and recognition of phytosanitary problems. That means the
farmer himself, his observer, the tractor drivers, storekeepers and others who
may have a role in plant protection.
The
precise determination of needs: through staff training,
the farm is monitored by a specific routine to these crops, to determine their
phytosanitary status and potential risks at any time. For this we use all
available means, visual surveillance countings, trapping control, calculation
of crop cycles and plant health issues, agricultural warnings, climate data.
This way, we monitor all potential risks, as well as evolution of the helpful
fauna. These controls are put in relation to the risks to the crops, evolution
probabilities and available action levels. This is the systematics which will
enable the farmer to take the
decision to wait or intervene, and in what way.
Monitoring trap for mediterranean fruit fly.
The precise product: each product has specific characteristics, and can meet a range of well-defined requirements. Uncontrolled side effects are those that cause the real environmental problems. It is essential to always use the most suitable product for the situation. A good spray efficiency is the best way not to need to do it again.
The
precise moment: this is the moment when the
solution proposed will be more effective on the problem to solve. Every
situation is different. Apply the product too soon reduces its effectiveness
because the target is not at its optimal time of sensitivity. Moreover, at
least in the case of insecticides, wait often allows beneficial insects to
settle and resolve the problem without the need to spray. Apply the product too
late, puts it in a situation where it may be insufficient, so it could be
necessary either complete it by another product, or spray a second time. Less
efficiency for superior economic and environmental cost.
Suitable
climatic conditions: we'll always spray without wind to
avoid the product drifts out of the crop, without rain to prevent runoff on the
ground, and with suitable temperature conditions. It is common during summer,
to have to spray by night to avoid intense heat, which can seriously reduce the
effectiveness of applications. But it can be difficult to combine all spraying
factors and weather conditions are not always easy to comply.
The
precise dosage: a too low dose will have
insufficient efficacy and may cause the need for a second application.
Moreover, the routine use of too low doses can lead to the emergence of
resistant strains (insects surviving to the spray gradually immunize to the
product). A too high dose will solve the problem, but with a high economic and
environmental extra cost, both harmful and unnecessary.
The
alternation of products: it is a basic rule in the use of
pesticides, chemical or biological. It is important to alternate products,
varying modes of action, so that the targeted problem has minimal risk for
developing resistance.
The
compliance with the conditions of use:
each product, before being marketed, goes through many stages of studies to
determine its terms, on each of the crops for which it will be allowed. This
applies to pre-harvest deadline (to reduce or avoid potentially present residue
upon consumption), to the distances to water points, to the time limit before
the entry of people or animals in sprayed plots, etc.
The
quality of application equipment: this is what will allow to
respect the precise dosage and specific moment. It is therefore fundamental.
These are mainly the type of machine and the type of nozzles. The machine must
be appropriate to the crop. We don't spray with the same equipment a wheat
field, a vineyard or a cherry orchard. But it is also the number of machines
that the farm needs, to react quickly in case of problem, so it doesn't take
serious proportions because of under-equipment, and slow reaction.
The
quality of personal protective equipment (PPE): these
are the gloves, boots, helmets or respirators, protective suits or tractor
cabins. It is essential that they are appropriate and in good condition. It is
also essential that persons handling these products, which are the most exposed,
wear them (I say this because many applicators do not like to wear them, and
thus take unnecessary risks). Under certain conditions, especially in summer
when it is hot, they can be quite uncomfortable. One of the most sensitive
points is the choice and the condition of the respiratory filters.
The
precautions when storing pesticides:
Each farm must be equipped with a safe storage place, so that products are safe
from the rain, cold, heat, in short, all conditions which could affect its
preservation. The place must be fire resistant, equipped with fire
extinguishers, and be able to contain spillage. Similarly, access should be
limited to a few people trained in handling pesticides.
The
precautions when preparing the phytosanitary mix:
a well done filling and washing point allows to control the risk of pollution
of soil and watercourses. The use of appropriate measuring instruments,
accurate enough and in good condition, provides the right mix of products.
Moreover, it is the moment of filling of the tanks that the product is the most
dangerous, since the package is opened and the product is concentrated. It is
therefore essential that all precautions be taken at that moment.
The
proper management of effluents and packaging:
it is a sometimes overlooked part. Yet it is very important because it avoids
serious consequences in the environment of filling points, and in the
environment of the farm in general. The destruction of packaging and its
recycling prevents them to be reused, for example for transport of drinking
water or getting lost in the environment.
This filling and washing point has an impermeable floor, retrieves all effluent for biological treatment (Phytobac® system), and is equipped with specialized measuring equipment.
All these issues boil down to two key points in the good management of farm inputs: training, and control.
I don't know any farmer who uses
pesticides for fun.
The farms have now included in the monitoring
routines of crops, all phytosanitary, meteorological and phenological (the
stage of development of crop, which directly influences its sensitivity)
observations, the presence of pests and diseases, the presence of helpful
insects (beneficial organisms such as pollinators and predators). These are the
main criteria that will allow us to take the decision to intervene or wait.
In developed countries, these
points are more or less all implemented. However in developing countries, only
exporters are really sensitized to it, by the demands of their customers. In
these countries, there is still much progress to do in the management of
pesticides.
It is clear that pesticides are
potentially dangerous.
But there are two very different
phases to be distinguished:
-
Handling of pesticides on the farm,
during which the pesticide arrives concentrate to be diluted, so is handled in
its dangerous phase. In this phase, the risk comes from the concentration of
the product. This is the dose effect, in the same way that an excess of
alcohol, coffee or drugs is dangerous for health.
-
The presence of possible residues on
food, for which each pesticide has been very thoroughly studied, prior to the
authorization of use. This work allows to conclude that risks that pesticides pose
to consumer health are extremely low, if not nonexistent. To hold otherwise, as
some don't hesitate to do, it's just to say that competent authorities
knowingly poison the population. An extremely grave charge, and
divested of any scientific foundation.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire